Singapore is a truly fascinating place. It’s one of a kind in so many ways, unique if you will. Having said that, I should point out that I’m not endorsing the Singapore Tourism Board’s campaign “Uniquely Singapore”, which I find boring and uninteresting. Terrible to be honest. All it does is say that Singapore is different, but now now it’s different through an interesting, inspiring idea that shapes a clear image about the place in people’s minds. This is a classic example of what ‘decision-making by committee’ leads to 9 times out of 10. And you can just imagine the politics involved in branding a country, let alone a country like Singapore. The sheer number of voices that have influenced this campaign is astronomical.
I find it a real pity that Lee Kuan Yew didn’t singlehandedly write the brand strategy based on his remarkable foresight and vision. Because if that would have been the case, I can assure the tourism board would have had a great campaign today.
The ‘campaign’ you now see was bland enough to get approved by the ginormous committee of officials on the unspoken grounds that it won’t offend anyone. Problem is, this is the very same reason it won’t excite or inspire anyone either. The Singapore Tourism Board isn’t what’s shaped the image of this country around the world anyway, Singapore Airlines has been a much more influential contributor to this over the last 30 years.
If you had to answer the question what Singapore is, other than a city and a country. I think, you would have to describe it as a huge real-life experiment that’s brought some 600sq kilometers of former British colony Malaya from 3rd world to 1st within a few decades. Today, Singapore is a prosperous 1st world nation with an enviable standard of living and GDP/capita on par with the world’s richest nations. Sure, the country has got its set of issues like any other country. And although the government’s views on political dissidents may not exactly trigger a spontaneously raised glass at Amnesty International’s annual convention dinner, judging by the standard of its neighbouring countries, it’s a remarkable phenomena. Lee Kuan Yew, the mastermind behind this miracle epitomises what’s probably best described as creative pragmatism.
Amazingly, Singaporeans and people around the world don’t associate the man with creativity, which I find rather peculiar. He is, however, seen as a brilliant strategist, but people tend to forget the disruptive, creative thinking that his strategies stem from. The man’s a true visionary with a unique persuasive ability that’s enabled him to create a miracle economy in less than 50 years. Hat off.
The remarkable thing is that he’s still going strong well into his eighties and his mind still continues to produce thinking and solutions that make leaders of states around the world seem Neanderthal. Sure, I appreciate that you can’t compare apples and oranges, but my point is that he’s still far ahead of the curve where a lot of people find him passé and a man of the past.
I feel extremely fortunate to be a part of the Singapore experiment, like a happy guinea pig. The question is how long its going to continue to flourish. My good friend Hari recently reminded me that no city state throughout history has continued to prosper for more than 50 years. Singapore is approaching this age. Fast.
If you haven’t had the opportunity to visit this city state, you should seriously start planning on a vist. English is the dominant language of the four official languages of Singapore alongside Mandarin, Malay and Tamil. But the Singaporean version of English called ‘Singlish’ is distinctively different from other English accents. In fact, it’s almost a language in and by itself. I love it.
If you do decide to pay Singapore a visit from the West and believe that easing your taste buds, not to mention your stomach, into the culinary wonderland of Singapore seems like a good idea, I suggest you take a look at the pronunciation guide below. I promise it’s come in really handy when you need it the most.



February 2, 2008 at 3:17 PM
I bet whore cakes sell like hotcakes.
February 3, 2008 at 12:40 PM
oh dear – i can just imagine some mom from north carolina ordering a round of whore cakes and or leng joo…
February 4, 2008 at 1:09 AM
I’ve been to Singapore before but hardly had time to really appreciate the sights. I was documenting a seminar there but I remember being really appreciative of the gadgets they sell. But I’ve been thinking of moving there for a good number of years. Maybe next year. It’s clean, simple and has a very low crime rate. Now ordering from McDonald’s is a different matter. Thanks for sharing the guide. As hilarious as it is, it might just come in handy in the future.
February 6, 2008 at 1:18 AM
The ‘Uniquely Singapore’ campaign is a blight on society.
Every country has an element that is unique about it – it is not limited just to Singapore – however to make it worse, the ads only highlight elements that are available throughout Asia which makes a complete mockery of the ‘unique’ positioning.
Of course the agency in question justify it by saying “The fact all these different parts of Asia are available in Singapore is what makes it unique” but that is the worst kind of advertising justification that should simply be flushed away.
I do like Singapore – it is clean, safe, has great infrastructure and a generally good standard of living – it is no where near deserving some of the abuse the World heaps on it … however it is by no means perfect and has definitely lost much of its forward thinking pragmatism since the phycological genius/visionary, Lee Kuan Yew, stepped down from all-encompassing power.
It is a great place that I feel very happy about being part of – but the way the present leadership is developing the country leaves me to question whether it’s growth will continue because I believe they’ve missed the point of Lee Kuan Yew’s vision and are now just focused on making it the most ‘business friendly place’ in Asia as opposed to using the foreign investment to allow the small nation to live and have the benefits of a major country.
The fact Lee Kuan Yew has publically spoken out against the Governments plans to increase the population to 6-6.5 million is testimony to this. He believes it should max out at 5.5 million because otherwise, with space so limited, it could affect how the community will be able to live and ultimately undermine the harmony of society and its appreciation of nature.
I don’t agree with all he has done – but I have nothing but respect for the man, which is more than can be said for most World leaders.
February 12, 2008 at 8:24 AM
Hi Fredrik,
Been quite some time since i posted any comments here, I tend to end up at Nina’s notanotherplanningblog, Jonas’ planning.se or Leon’s ThePlanningLab.
When it comes to how countries market themselves it usually is spelled b-o-r-i-n-g – we work with Turkey towards the Sccanidnavian markets now and all they get from Turkey is the most predicitble, stereotypical kind of “minarets and beaches”. Well, we intend to to some extent extend Turkey to hold more than old culture, Istanbul i e is a modern European/Asian city to visit for a weekend, just like Barcelona.
So how is life in southeast Asia? I feel it is time to maybe go global in my carreer and all tips are most appreciated.
Keep blogging!
/Peter Ericsson
February 12, 2008 at 9:00 AM
I agree with you Rob. Not just about the STB campaign, but also about the founder of this nation. Lee Kuan Yew is a remarkable visionary, far more visionary that most people in the ‘next generation’ actually realise.
Hello Peter, long time no see. And welcome back. Those blogs you mentioned are interesting reads so I’m not surprised you don’t make it over here very often.
I struggle to think of any country campaign that’s done really well both from a strategy and an execution perspective. I’m sure there must be something decent around. I just can’t think of it right now. Conventionally, these things are simply compilations of what the tourism board in respective countries believe are the biggest attractions for potential tourists, namely famous landmarks, sights and sometimes shopping/entertainment opportunities. That’s all well and good, but what’s missing are those human, cultural elements; the little differences that often make the biggest difference on the overall experience. I wonder why that is. Imagine campaigns using self-deprecating humour for what foreigners regard as typically French [as rude as it may be] British or German behaviour….those little quirks. You know, things that allow you to relate to a place through its people in a human, resonant way.
February 13, 2008 at 1:18 AM
It is amazing how bad country tourism campaigns tend to be – however there are a couple of exceptions – New Zealand [100% Pure] and Malaysia [Truly Asia] though in the latter case, the executions are generally poor.
However interms of the best tourism campaign for a single location, the M&C work for Victoria Australia is not just one of the best campaigns in its category, but in advertising fullstop.
February 13, 2008 at 7:13 AM
Yes, ‘100% Pure’ is a really nice one. I didn’t think of that one. It really captures the essence of New Zealand in an emotional way. As or Malaysia’s ‘Truly Asia’, it has great potential in terms of strategy, but falls rather flat on its execution. Still, it’s above average [which doesn't really say much].
I haven’t seen that M&C campaign so I can’t really comment. Will try to find it on Youtube. [Interesting to note that you're commending M&C work. Ahem.]
February 19, 2008 at 12:49 PM
February 26, 2008 at 11:40 PM
[...] A Country Unique? February 27, 2008, 7:40 am Filed under: Comment Despite the fact I [and Fred] passionately hate/disagree with Singapore’s underwhelming tourism campaign positioning [...]
February 29, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Come on – get on with it – I know you’re busy but this is ridiculous
March 6, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Alright, alright.