To make great communication – the kind that stops you in your tracks and sparks off a spontaneous emotional response that either alters or re-enforces the way you feel and think about something in a specific way – takes a lot of skill. But I think it takes almost as much skill, although of a different kind, to produce something as staid, bland and completely uninspiring as this Nokia N-series commercial. It puts me at a loss of words. And I’m not in a merciful mood today.
This commercial leaves me with a sense of emptiness and melancholy. A two-second introspective investigation tells me that this response is triggered by the profoundly contrived way in which some [supposed] industry colleagues have tried to make an emotional connection with me as a consumer by anthropomorphing a mobile phone through a series of clichéd vignettes. Who do they think I am? What do they think people of this world are like? I wonder if they’ve ever met real people. Maybe in their childhood they did, before they joined Adland.
Wieden + Kennedy, who will take the global, creative lead for Nokia from now on, have a formidable task in front of them by getting a great brand back on track creatively on a global scale. It’s not that they have a broken brand to mend, far from it, but they certainly have to do a lot better than this.
Nokia is one of those global companies that worship almost fanatically at the church of consistency, not just in terms of a core brand idea [which is fine] but in terms of execution as well. It’s easier that way. A friend of mine tells me that until fairly recently, they insisted that Norwegian creative teams be put on the account in Bates’ offices around the world, since they believed this would help ensure consistency of creative work for the [then] Oslo-led account. I don’t know whether this is completely true to be honest. But it doesn’t really matter. What’s true and clearly evident is that ‘global consistency above all else’ has been the managerial parole. And I can’t help but feel that local relevancy has been overlooked as a result.
So how shall W+K help connect and re-connect Nokia to people around the world? A good start would be to send people out from its London office to the four corners of the world to unlearn about their British or American advertising lives and begin to approach things the way Nokia’s customers do it…the majority of them that is. After all, most of them have never heard of neither turkey stuffing nor Yorkshire pudding. They don’t know who Mr. Rogers is and they probably believe Monty Python is a Serpentarium.
I know for a fact that the Chinese, the Indians, the Arabs and the South Americans aren’t going to change their lives and their perspectives on it based on what ad people in London think and do.
Getting a grip on cultural differences and their implications on brands can be quite tricky. Especially for global companies to which process, not creative output, seems to have become an end in and by itself.
Conveying brand values across cultures, which I’ve previously posted on, can subsequently be very complicated indeed. Language barriers don’t make it any easier either. In collectivist China, for example, “Connecting People” has been a cultural platitude for generations. Consumers in Chinese and other Asian Confucian cultures are unlikely to respond in the same positive way a Western person [accustomed to individualism and becoming more aware of interpersonal relationships] would. Nokia may have learned this in China some years ago. The line ‘Connecting People’ in Chinese read: ‘Chenggong zaiyu lianxi’ and literally means, ‘success is because of connecting’. A translation that takes the brand into quite a different area.
When Nokia was pushing for “Human Technology”, the Chinese line read: ‘Keji yi ren wei ben’. This can be translated as, ‘Science and technology depend on human beings”, which again is a bit of a leap from the global platform. However, I suspect these were ‘accidental’ language adaptations, as neither of the examples above seem particularly clever or resonant in Chinese either.
It shall be extremely interesting to see what W+K’s will do with Nokia. My expectations are quite high. But whatever they do, I hope they approach the task with a view and realization that the Anglo-Saxon cultural perspective on communication is not representative for a vast majority of Nokia’s customers and potential customers of this world. To illustrate what I’m talking about, I’m borrowing a print ad from The Economist’s new campaign [which I really like].

October 1, 2007 at 7:03 AM
Jesus, that is a shit ad. Fabulous post Fred.
October 1, 2007 at 11:07 AM
Yes, a great post. Really interesting some of the translations that you took us through because I’ve been giving some thought to the notion of what mobile phones and Nokia stand for, and the Chinese translations are closer to some ideas I’ve been mulling over than the occidental variety. More later mate.
October 1, 2007 at 11:42 AM
If that was my future in my hand I think I’d be calling The Samaritans.
October 1, 2007 at 8:11 PM
Yes, Angus, it’s not exactly best in class, is it?
Charles, I would be curious to hear some of your mobile phone-related ideas at some point.
John, I wonder if you would have been able to make that call to The Samaritans in time before the men in white coats would have gotten to you.
October 2, 2007 at 8:39 AM
Excellent post Fred. Bloody brilliant.
October 3, 2007 at 4:28 AM
Good one mate. W+K does have a great challenge on its hands. And as you and me know from first hand experience, not many Asians know the real Asia or their people either, so people selection is going to be the most important factor in this being a successful case study for W+K.
October 3, 2007 at 8:50 AM
Well said Fred. I saw someone from Nokia speak over summer, spouting proper toss about deep and meaningful cultural trends – like you would here from a policy wonk.
I just get the impression they have a pyramid of gurus that will stop the agency that does ‘voice’ being able to say anything at all. But on the other hand, someone would have said something similar about Honda..
October 3, 2007 at 11:14 PM
Absolutely Hari. And good point NP. Thanks Kaiser!
October 16, 2007 at 4:20 PM
Great post Fred. When I saw the ad (before reading the post) it reminded me of one of those unremarkable, anodyne ads you get on CNN targeted at business travellers. Impersonal and a bit unreal. If anyone can sort this out I’d like to think W & K can. Their work is rarely short of character and relevance
October 17, 2007 at 2:39 AM
Yes Neil, the difference between those “unremarkable anodyne ads” and this Nokia spot are almost nonexistent. It’s as if the people who’ve made them think mobile phone users and business travelers are two different breeds of extraterrestrial freaks; creatures with a completely different perspective on life than us human beings. I beg to disagree with them.
October 18, 2007 at 10:47 AM
My only worry is that while Nokia need their brand to have some emotional value in their communication [which WK can do in spades] what’s really going to turn them around is more interms of creating social network technology – like iTunes did for iPod and Apple as a whole – elements that Nokia and WK are not exactly the greatest at. I hope I am wrong …