<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/</link>
	<description>Fredrik Sarnblad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MisEntropy</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>MisEntropy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Whitepaper outlining an Ad Pre-Testing model based on Prediction Markets...&lt;/strong&gt;

A long while ago, Leland Maschmeyer (posting at his erstwhile blog &#039;Whistle Through Your Comb&#039;) had put forth the idea of prediction markets substituting for advertising pre-testing. As a self-confessed believer of prediction markets-for-everything, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Whitepaper outlining an Ad Pre-Testing model based on Prediction Markets&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A long while ago, Leland Maschmeyer (posting at his erstwhile blog &#8216;Whistle Through Your Comb&#8217;) had put forth the idea of prediction markets substituting for advertising pre-testing. As a self-confessed believer of prediction markets-for-everything, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lethal Research &#171; Fredrik Sarnblad</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>Lethal Research &#171; Fredrik Sarnblad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>[...] posted on the misuse of ‘research’ before and maintain my position: copious amounts of money is poured into research predicated on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted on the misuse of ‘research’ before and maintain my position: copious amounts of money is poured into research predicated on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>What did the emails say Gary ... and reading between the lines, how much was down to &#039;simplicity&#039; and &#039;price&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did the emails say Gary &#8230; and reading between the lines, how much was down to &#8217;simplicity&#8217; and &#8216;price&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Schirr</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Schirr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>In my blog yesterday, I asked readers why their organizations continue to use focus groups despite 40 years of research that shows that group interaction kills ideas and kills the most creative ideas. I have one comment and five emails so far. Does someone on this site have reasons for using the group-think tools despite idea-killing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my blog yesterday, I asked readers why their organizations continue to use focus groups despite 40 years of research that shows that group interaction kills ideas and kills the most creative ideas. I have one comment and five emails so far. Does someone on this site have reasons for using the group-think tools despite idea-killing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredrik sarnblad</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3042</link>
		<dc:creator>fredrik sarnblad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3042</guid>
		<description>Will check out your post Gary. Freddy Krueger sounds like an interesting analogy. Good to have you here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will check out your post Gary. Freddy Krueger sounds like an interesting analogy. Good to have you here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Schirr</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Schirr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>For forty years research has shown that groupthink techniques like focus groups and brainstorming kill ideas and kill the most creative ideas. (For example see &quot;Voice of the Customer&quot;) Yet they won&#039;t die -- people keep using them. 

In a recent post in my blog I compared this techniques to Freddy Krueger...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For forty years research has shown that groupthink techniques like focus groups and brainstorming kill ideas and kill the most creative ideas. (For example see &#8220;Voice of the Customer&#8221;) Yet they won&#8217;t die &#8212; people keep using them. </p>
<p>In a recent post in my blog I compared this techniques to Freddy Krueger&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A man&#8217;s got to know his limitations&#8230; &#171; Fredrik Sarnblad</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>A man&#8217;s got to know his limitations&#8230; &#171; Fredrik Sarnblad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>[...] of methodologies involving direct questions to people. I’ve previously touched on this here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of methodologies involving direct questions to people. I’ve previously touched on this here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clients of the world, use your judgment! &#171; Fredrik Sarnblad</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Clients of the world, use your judgment! &#171; Fredrik Sarnblad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>[...] Don’t get me wrong, research can be a wonderful insight source if it’s conducted intelligently. However, I find ‘pre-testing’ in most shapes and forms directly detrimental to original ideas and creativity. And I’ve yet to work with a research company that has managed to get me to rethink my position on this topic. More about my position here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don’t get me wrong, research can be a wonderful insight source if it’s conducted intelligently. However, I find ‘pre-testing’ in most shapes and forms directly detrimental to original ideas and creativity. And I’ve yet to work with a research company that has managed to get me to rethink my position on this topic. More about my position here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob @ Cynic</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob @ Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>Fred ... this albeit brilliant, paper has had more &#039;use&#039; out of it than almost everything we&#039;ve done put together.

Time for you to do another one to last us the next 6 months, ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred &#8230; this albeit brilliant, paper has had more &#8216;use&#8217; out of it than almost everything we&#8217;ve done put together.</p>
<p>Time for you to do another one to last us the next 6 months, ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc english</title>
		<link>http://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>marc english</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fredriksarnblad.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/goodbye-innovation/#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>fredrik, if you happen to be in touch with victoria, pass along my greetings. thanx.
marc
p.s. ...nice article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fredrik, if you happen to be in touch with victoria, pass along my greetings. thanx.<br />
marc<br />
p.s. &#8230;nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
